TextCortex AI Review: Key Features, Pros & Cons

Every time I meet new people and they find out that I’m a content creator, they raise their eyebrows in surprise. They are surprised because they think that with the emergence of AI technology, professions like mine have already ceased to exist. Why would anyone pay an expert like me to write texts for days if AI writing tools can do it in a matter of minutes? 

Luckily for me and my colleagues, AI technology at its present level of development can’t replace human writing. Nonetheless, it can definitely make the lives of writers easier and help us improve the quality of content. The only problem is that there seem to be more tools than you can use within your lifetime. Then, how do you find those worth relying on? By reading honest reviews, of course. 

And that’s why I want to share my experience of using one of the popular tools – TextCortex AI – that everyone from students and writers to marketers and developers can benefit from. I will do my best to make this TextCortex review a deep dive into my personal experience with the platform and a useful article that will help you decide if it’s the right tool for your needs.

What is TextCortex AI?

Simply put, it’s a writing platform designed to assist with various text-based tasks. TextCortex AI is an excellent helper when you need to generate, rewrite, summarize, and translate content. One of the platform’s features that gives it a clear competitor advantage is its strong emphasis on multi-language support, as you can choose from over 25 languages. 

The goal of the TextCortex AI writer is to help users overcome writer’s block and produce original content without the tedious manual effort. All in all, I can say that it’s an interesting blend of a general-purpose AI and a specialized writing tool.

Key Features of TextCortex

Without a doubt, these general statements are not enough for you to get a well-rounded impression of the platform. Therefore, let’s move to specific TextCortex features that I discovered while using it.

AI Writing & Paraphrasing

The core strength of TextCortex writing lies in its sophisticated paraphrasing and rewriting engine. It has a free version and provides several options for a single input, which makes it easy for you to choose the result that best fits your tone and style. This is especially useful for students looking to rephrase academic papers or for marketers trying to create fresh copy from the materials they already have.

You can also use other free tools at TextCortex if you are not ready to subscribe yet. For instance, you can detect and fix AI with a text humanizer tool. I use it from time to time to manage my tasks faster.

ZenoChat (AI Chatbot Integration)

It’s an integrated AI chatbot that functions as a conversational assistant and can be a fantastic alternative to other popular chatbots like ChatGPT. To me, this chatbot integration feels more specialized than general-purpose AI assistants, as it works with prompts and responses customized for writing and content creation tasks.

Browser Extensions & Integrations

I don’t know about you, but I find switching between different applications when I’m working very annoying and distracting. That’s why I’m a big fan of TextCortex’s browser extension option. It works seamlessly across popular platforms like Google Docs, Gmail, LinkedIn, and various content management systems. 

Multi-language Support

I’ve already mentioned the multilingual capability of the platform, but I also want to add that it extends beyond simple translation and includes native content creation in various languages. If you have a business that operates in foreign markets or you work with international content regularly, this feature is something worth your attention.

Pros and Cons

As a person who uses numerous digital resources for content creation every day, I know that no tool is perfect. So, let’s have a balanced look at the TextCortex AI pros and cons.

Pros

• Impressive paraphrasing and rewriting. I believe that this is where TextCortex truly shines. Everything works fast, and it’s easy to maintain the original meaning of the text while making it unique.
• Strong multilingual support. As mentioned before, the ability to work in over 25 languages is a massive advantage for users who need to create content for a global market.
• Seamless integrations. The fact that you can use the AI assistant directly within the applications you already use saves a lot of time and effort.
• User-friendly interface. Even for a first-time user, it doesn’t take long to get the hang of its features and start generating content.

Cons

• Expensive for full use. While there is a free plan, the paid plans can be quite costly for users who will rely on the tool daily.
• Limited free credits. The free plan is a great way to test the tool, but the limited number of credits doesn’t allow you to use it for serious work.
• Sometimes repetitive output. With certain prompts, the AI can produce repetitive or generic outputs. This means that you can’t avoid additional editing to improve the quality of your texts.
• Limited word count. While the paid plans offer “unlimited” creations, there can still be limitations on the word count. It can stand in the way of generating long-form content in a single go.

TextCortex Pricing

If you consider making this platform your regular assistant, you need to understand how much it costs. The service follows a freemium model with several paid tiers starting with a free plan that provides 2,500 words per month. Frankly speaking, it’s quite limited for regular users. The cheapest option starts at $5.59 per month (billed annually) and includes 15,000 words monthly, while the unlimited plan costs $83.99 per month.

After I’ve analyzed the numbers, I would say that this pricing system is beneficial for heavy users who need unlimited generation. As to occasional users, it won’t be too hard for them to find a better TextCortex AI alternative with more generous free tiers or lower-cost paid plans.

Compared to competitors, TextCortex sits in the middle range for pricing. Jasper AI typically costs $49 per month for comparable features, making TextCortex competitive at the higher end. Copy.ai offers similar functionality starting around $36 per month, while Textero provides more student-focused features, such as the ability to find references, at significantly lower price points, often under $10 per month. 

Who Should Use TextCortex?

Based on my experience and a broader look at TextCortex AI reviews, the platform can be a solid support for:

• Students will find the paraphrasing and rewriting tools to be the ultimate weapon for rephrasing notes or academic papers without the risk of plagiarism.
• Content creators because TextCortex can generate ideas and help you overcome writer’s block within minutes.
• Businesses with a global presence will find the multilingual functions to be a massive advantage when it comes to localizing content without any additional resources.

My Experience with TextCortex

My personal experience with the tool was generally positive, though it came with a few caveats. To show you how it works, I used the paraphrasing tool to rephrase a short passage from Mark Twain’s ‘The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn’. Here’s what I got:

As you can see, the tool grasped the main idea but made a couple of mistakes. It provides especially confusing content if the input is written using a poetic language and numerous metaphors. Overall, I must say that it’s a tool that helps you get 80% of the way there, but the final 20% (the creative and strategic part) still belongs to you.

TextCortex Alternatives

If, after reading this article and giving TextCortex a go, you realize that it is not your cup of tea, you have plenty of other options. For example, Jasper AI provides more advanced long-form content creation functions but at a higher price point. The platform has all the necessary resources to help you succeed in marketing copy and brand voice consistency. The only thing it lacks is TextCortex’s specialized paraphrasing focus.

If you are on a budget, Textero is another great choice. It focuses on providing a more streamlined and affordable writing experience, particularly for academic tasks, with features that are tailored to students’ needs. While it may lack some of the business-focused features, it provides better value for educational use cases.

Continuing on, Copy.ai offers similar functionality with a more user-friendly interface and competitive pricing. The template library is extensive, and the AI quality is comparable, though multilingual support is more limited. 

Final Verdict 

It’s safe to say that TextCortex is great when it comes to tasks like rewriting and multilingual content. However, while it’s great for generating drafts and overcoming writer’s block, the text you get almost always needs human editing. On top of that, the limited free credits and cost of paid plans can be a massive obstacle. 

FAQ

Is TextCortex free? 

TextCortex offers a free plan with a limited number of daily creations. This allows you to test most of its features before committing to a paid subscription.

How many languages does TextCortex support? 

TextCortex supports over 25 languages and overcomes its competitors with ease. You are welcome to try its translation and content generation functions in various languages.

Is TextCortex better than Jasper? 

Whether TextCortex is better than Jasper depends on your specific needs. TextCortex has excellent paraphrasing and multilingual support, and Jasper might be a more suitable option thanks to its long-form content generation and numerous features.

Can I use TextCortex for academic work? 

Yes, its paraphrasing and rewriting features come in handy when you need to manage your tasks faster. However, it’s crucial to use it as an assistant for drafting, not for generating work without a human touch.

What’s the best alternative to TextCortex?

I would go for Textero because it offers features like an AI essay writer, research assistant, and citation generator, which come in handy not only for students. It is also a more affordable and user-friendly option.